Standards developed using the OpenStand principles are developed through an open, participatory process, support interoperability, foster global competition, are voluntarily adopted on a global level and serve as building blocks for products and services targeted to meet the needs of markets and consumers. This drives innovation which, in turn, contributes to the creation of new markets and the growth and expansion of existing markets. There are five, key OpenStand Principles, as outlined below: Cooperation Respectful cooperation between standards organizations, whereby each respects the autonomy, integrity, processes, and intellectual property rules of the others.
PI to gather all relevant information, organize required documents for approval. REB receives the study. REB triage the incoming study based on several factors including risk.
Review assessment is conducted. A decision to approve the study is made. More information is required. Initial Submissions When submitting a study, the REB determines one of the following review paths, depending on the nature and risk profile of the submission.
This application is only completed once per study. Renew via CAPCR Question 2 Is the research study closed to enrolment but subjects are still participating in research procedures outlined in the protocol?
Events that Should be Reported Any event that meets the following criteria: Any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the following criteria: Unanticipated Problem Reporting Guidance.
What counts as research? In summary, research involving humans is considered to include any of the following: What does not count as research?
Research involving only the use of published or publicly available information or materials Assessment activities such as quality assessment studies, performance reviews, or testing within normal educational requirements do not generally require REB review and approval If you cannot determine whether an intended investigation constitutes research, contact the Chair of the REB or an Ethics Coordinator for assistance.
How does the REB review protocols? Some criteria by which research may qualify for delegated review are: The panel to which proposals are directed for review depends on: Why does the REB review the study budget?
Feasibility Conflict of Interest How do I find out the status of my protocol application? How should I submit my REB submissions? Currently, all other submissions e. When should I submit a pregnancy follow up consent form to the REB?
A consent form for pregnancy follow up must be submitted in the event of pregnancy. Considering it is rare that research participants or their partners become pregnant while participating in a clinical research study, to facilitate review and approval process, the REB does not recommend submitting a consent form for pregnancy follow with the initial submission, unless required by the study objectives.
How do I make the required changes to documents that have been reviewed by the REB?
When revising documents that have been reviewed by the REB, the requested revisions should be tracked and made on a clean copy the REB reviewed document.
Please ensure that the version dates of the document are updated. Please note that the REB will not accept documents that include both new revisions and the revisions that were previously reviewed by the REB.
Can a participant be given new information which may influence their current consent prior to REB approval? Consent is an ongoing process and participants should be provided with any and all new information that may influence their consent.
New information may be provided, verbally or otherwise, to participants prior to receiving REB approval if the Principal Investigator: Why is there often more than one set of questions during a review?
It is the nature of research that answers often lead to more questions and the REB review element of research is no different.
In the course of review, information provided by the study team may result in requests from the REB:Anyone who starts looking into the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion will frequently encounter the old chestnut about a "hoax" or a "forgery".
When Philip Graves made the allegation in , long before the days of the internet and all the pages detailing the various logical fallacies, his target audience had never heard of a circular argument or a non sequitur.
NSF January 29, Chapter II - Proposal Preparation Instructions. Each proposing organization that is new to NSF or has not had an active NSF assistance award within the previous five years should be prepared to submit basic organization and management information and certifications, when requested, to the applicable award-making division within the Office of Budget, Finance & Award.
Wikipedia policies and guidelines are developed by the community to describe best practices, clarify principles, resolve conflicts, and otherwise further our goal of creating a free, reliable encyclopedia. There is no need to read any policy or guideline pages to start editing.
The five pillars is a popular summary of the most pertinent principles. Most recently added records are displayed first. 1; Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions.
The Software Development Template Pack includes 54 templates to assist your software developers, test team and technical writers during the software development lifecycle. ix 2 1 Contents PART I An Introduction to Educational Research 1 Chapter The Process of Conducting Research Using Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches 2 A.